EN09 - Validation and Clinical Utility of a Canine Point-of-care Hemoglobin A1c Assay and Establishing Reference Interval

Background:  Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) assay validation is essential for establishing analytical reliability, evaluating discrimination between diabetic and non-diabetic dogs, and establishing reference intervals.

Hypothesis/

Objectives:  Validate a canine HbA1c point-of-care analyzer (Vet Chroma™), evaluate its diagnostic performance, and establish a reference interval in healthy dogs.

Animals: 51 diabetic dogs, 44 non-diabetic controls, and 42 healthy client-owned dogs.

Methods:  Prospective validation of precision, linearity, interference, and storage stability. Method comparison used an immunoturbidimetric comparator assay (Olympus DxC 700 AU). Diagnostic performance was evaluated via ROC analysis, likelihood ratios, and odds ratios.

Results:  Average intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 3.92% and 8.47%. Linearity over the clinical range (0.86%–6.27% HbA1c%) was strong (R² = 0.973) with minor constant bias. HbA1c remained stable for 5 days at 4°C and up to 3 months at both -20°C and -80°C, but not reliably at 6 months. Lipemia and icterus exhibited variable interfering effects. Method comparison indicated non-interchangeability with the comparator assay. Diabetic dogs had significantly higher HbA1c than non-diabetic (mean 5.10% vs 1.58%). ROC analysis yielded AUC of 0.969, with a cutoff > 3.22% achieving 90.20% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The positive likelihood ratio was not estimable, and the odds ratio was 22.90 (95% CI, 3.60-146.90). Healthy young dogs’ reference interval was 1.25% (95% CI, 1.19–1.59) to 2.75% (95% CI, 2.56–2.90).
Conclusions and Clinical Importance: The Vet Chroma™ provides reliable HbA1c measurements in canine whole blood and effectively discriminates diabetic from non-diabetic dogs. Results should be interpreted alongside clinical and clinicopathologic findings.